Friday, April 26, 2024
  • Procore Leaderboard 2024
  • CWRE 2024 - Leaderboard
  • Keith Walking Floor - Leaderboard - Sept 2021
  • Revizto - Leaderboard - March and April
  • Dentec - Leaderboard - 2023 - Updated
  • IAPMO R&T Lab - Leaderboard
  • Premier Leaderboard - updated Nov 19
March 20, 2019

Sault Ste. Marie to try new construction process on $25 million McMeeken replacement

 

 

As reported on SooToday.com, Sault Ste. Marie City Council gave agreement in principle tonight to demolishing the 51-year-old McMeeken Centre and replacing it with a new $25 million twin-pad arena.

The city will now spend an initial $1.1 million for architectural and engineering services to get the project rolling.

City staff has been authorized to apply for infrastructure funding for the project from higher levels of government.

Council voted 7-3 tonight to approve the idea, with Ward 4 Coun. Marchy Bruni, Ward 1 Coun. Sandra Hollingsworth and Ward 2’s Luke Dufour opposed.

Coun. Bruni expressed concern that approval was being sought for the project before funding was in place.

“My first option is to go to the provincial and federal governments first….we don’t know where the money’s coming from,” Bruni said. “I don’t want to be on the hook for $25 million.”

Coun. Sandra Hollingsworth said spending $25 million for an arena seemed steep in view of the condition of city roads.

Ward 3 Coun. Matthew Shoemaker pointed to significant operational problems at the McMeeken in recent years and said we certainly need to replace the aging facility.

Tom Vair, the city’s deputy chief administrative officer for community development and enterprise services, said consideration will be given to selling naming rights to the facility.

Vair also said that the city will try a construction management process for the first time on the new arena.

Here’s how Vair describes the new method, as opposed to design-build or design-bid-build construction:

This method includes first conducting a request for proposals (RFP) to select a construction management firm (CM).

This firm is selected based on their qualifications and experience building the type of facility being constructed (in our case an arena) as well as the price of their construction management services which include project management and budgeting.

The CM is then involved in the RFP process to select the architect and design firm.

The CM acts as owners agent and the owner knows the construction management fee and architect/engineer fees up front.

The project doesn’t have to wait for all specs to be completed and therefore design changes can be made at various design phases without significant additional cost.

This method encourages the owner, CM and architect to work as a team to finalize the design based on the combined experience of the group.

The CM can work within a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) which the owner sets.

“Staff have reviewed a number of arena projects across Canada,” Vair said in a report to Mayor Provenzano and city councillors.

Keep reading on SooToday.com

 


Watch the video and learn more about Construction Links Network – the peer-to-peer network sharing platform for the construction, building and design community.

Ideal for YOUR Press Releases | Project Updates | New Appointments | Awards & Milestones | Company News | New Products/Services | Brochures | Videos | Infographics | Blog Sharing | Events and More