Tuesday, October 1, 2024
  • NIBS - Digital Twins 2024
  • CWRE 2024
  • IAPMO R&T Lab - Leaderboard
  • Premier Construction Software - Leaderboard New - Sept 5
  • Keith Walking Floor - Leaderboard - Sept 2021
  • Canadian Concrete Expo 2025 - Leaderboard
  • Procore Leaderboard 2024
  • Revizto - Leaderboard - September and October 2024
  • Dentec - Leaderboard - 2023 - Updated
  • Sage Leaderboard
circular practices in construction steel
January 30, 2021

Proposed model shows potential for circular practices in construction steel

Contrary to popular belief, a profitable business model for reused construction steel is not nearly as impossible as one may believe.

Steelmakers have almost perfected the “recycle” element of the four hierarchical elements of the circular economy — reduce, reuse, remanufacture and recycle — with steel recycling rates of almost 90 percent.

Despite the recycling success, however, the steel industry is increasingly facing pressure to decarbonize. Recycling steel is still both energy- and cost-intensive, and both steelmakers and their customers must go further to reduce environmental impacts. One way to do this is to shift to a reuse model.

Simultaneously, the built environment is working on lowering the embodied carbon of buildings — emissions from the manufacture of building materials — which make up about 11 percent of total global emissions. With steel being a main contributor to embodied carbon in buildings, one approach — the reuse of steel from older buildings in new construction projects — has gained attention, yet the supply of reused construction steel remains low.

The practice of steel reuse is not new. For example, the industry has reused train rails and automotive components for decades, but reusing construction steel poses unique challenges. Experts in the steel industry view the barriers to a profitable reused construction steel model as insurmountable. Even if they are not, who are the main players in this new circular supply chain?

In particular, is there even a role for a primary steel producer? How will steelmakers adapt their supply chains, manage storage and validate the steel quality? If steelmakers are involved, can this new business model create shareholder value without cannibalizing new steel sales?

Our team of four graduate students at the Yale School of the Environment tackled these questions as part of a consulting clinic course and developed one potential business model for our “client,” ArcelorMittal, one of the world’s largest steel producers. Dubbed the “Steel Buyback Bundle Program,” the proposed model we developed on its behalf would enable steelmakers to offer reused construction steel profitably.

Keep reading on GreenBiz.com

  • IAPMO R&T Lab - Leaderboard
  • NIBS - Digital Twins 2024
  • Keith Walking Floor - Leaderboard - Sept 2021
  • Procore Leaderboard 2024
  • Sage Leaderboard
  • CWRE 2024
  • Premier Construction Software - Leaderboard New - Sept 5
  • Dentec - Leaderboard - 2023 - Updated
  • Revizto - Leaderboard - September and October 2024
  • Canadian Concrete Expo 2025 - Leaderboard