The architect for the Grenfell Tower refurbishment has admitted that he did not check official advice on fire safety in high rises, during the work.
Bruce Sounes, from Studio E, told the inquiry he was not aware of concerns over the safety of combustible panels often being used on housing blocks.
He said fire safety details were for specialist consultants and added that he had not designed the cladding used.
The fire at the 24-storey tower in west London killed 72 people in June 2017.
The inquiry – now in its second phase – is looking into how the building came to be covered in such cladding during its refurbishment between 2012 and 2016.
Mr Sounes was in charge of the day-to-day management of the refurbishment project for the tower.
On the second day of hearings, Mr Sounes was being examined about his knowledge of the building regulations and associated guidance.
He was unable to explain to the inquiry how the new cladding system chosen for Grenfell met the government’s guidance for fire safety in tall buildings, despite accepting that fire safety was “fundamental to the work of an architect’s practice”.
Mr Sounes said he was familiar with the broad regulation that a building should not be able to spread fire on the outside.
But he “didn’t recall hearing of” the specific guidance that materials had to be of “limited combustibility” when used above 18m (59ft).
Inquiry barrister Kate Grange asked him: “You didn’t apply your mind at the time of the Grenfell project to how this clause applied to the materials that you were selecting?”
He responded: “As I wasn’t myself preparing the documents – I did not, no.”
The next publication deadline is Friday at noon
Join Construction Links Network