Saturday, May 18, 2024
  • Dentec - Leaderboard - 2023 - Updated
  • Keith Walking Floor - Leaderboard - Sept 2021
  • IAPMO R&T Lab - Leaderboard
  • Premier Leaderboard - updated Nov 19
  • Procore Leaderboard 2024
  • CWRE 2024
  • Revizto - Leaderboard - May and June 2024
  • Sage Leaderboard
Carp builder fined $90,000 after worker struck by reversing bulldozer
October 31, 2020

Carp builder fined $90,000 after worker struck by reversing bulldozer

Aecon Construction Ontario East Ltd., of Carp, has been fined $90,000 after pleading guilty in connection with a 2018 incident in which a bulldozer struck a road worker at a site on Highway 417.

The unidentified worker, who was described as in his 20s at the time of the incident, suffered “critical injuries” at the site between Maitland Avenue and Island Park Drive, a Ministry of Labour release said.

Justice of the Peace Herb Kreling heard in Ontario’s Provincial Offences Court that the incident occurred June 11, 2018, when the worker and an equipment operator were working as a team on a part of Highway 417. The worker was taking elevation readings using a GPS laser.

The worker was unable to initially get a signal for the GPS equipment and moved to find a better spot, ending up behind the bulldozer.

Keep reading in the Ottawa Citizen

Background:

  • On June 11, 2018, a worker and an equipment operator were working as a team on a part of Highway 417 in Ottawa. The worker was tasked with taking elevation readings using a GPS laser and marking out the readings on the ground, while the equipment operator was operating a bulldozer.
  • The worker taking the readings could not receive a signal for the GPS equipment and attempted to locate a signal by walking to different areas of the site. While doing so the worker was facing west, back to the bulldozer.
  • The bulldozer’s operator was in the process of back-blading material, a process where the operator pushes material forward and then runs the blade over the material in reverse. The operator placed the bulldozer in reverse (which activated the back-up alarm on the bulldozer) looked over one shoulder and proceeded to reverse after not noticing anyone behind. The back-up alarm could not be heard over the noise of Highway 417.
  • The worker taking readings was knocked to the ground.
  • The bulldozer operator noticed two survey workers running toward the bulldozer. The operator stopped the bulldozer, saw a hardhat on the ground, exited the bulldozer and found the worker on the ground.
  • As a result of the contact, the worker suffered critical injuries
  • A visibility and line-of-sight assessment was conducted by a Ministry of Labour, Training and Skills Development ergonomist. The line-of-sight assessment identified any blind spots or areas with an obstructed view from the perspective of the equipment operator.
  • The visibility and line of sight assessment determined that the injured worker would not reasonably have been noticed by the equipment operator while the bulldozer was reversing and the ability for the operator to view the worker within the rear-view mirror while reversing the bulldozer would have become progressively more obstructed. In such a scenario, a signaller should have been used to assist the equipment operator.
  • Section 104, subsection 3 of O. Reg. 213/91 – the Regulation for Construction Projects – states that operators of vehicles, machines and equipment shall be assisted by signallers if the operator’s view of the intended path of travel is obstructed and/or a person could be endangered by the vehicle, machine or equipment or by its load.
  • The Occupational Health and Safety Act states that an employer shall ensure that the measures and procedures prescribed are carried out in the workplace.
  • Accordingly, Aecon Construction Ontario East Limited, as an employer, failed to ensure that the equipment operator was assisted by a signaller as required by the regulation.