Saturday, October 5, 2024
  • Revizto - Leaderboard - September and October 2024
  • Procore Leaderboard 2024
  • CWRE 2024
  • Sage Leaderboard
  • Canadian Concrete Expo 2025 - Leaderboard
  • Keith Walking Floor - Leaderboard - Sept 2021
  • IAPMO R&T Lab - Leaderboard
  • Dentec - Leaderboard - 2023 - Updated
  • NIBS - Digital Twins 2024
  • Premier Construction Software - Leaderboard New - Sept 5
November 12, 2021

Engineer not qualified to design 11-storey Langford highrise, professional body says

The structural engineer who designed a Langford highrise where tenants were forced to move out for safety reasons made a “critical error in judgment” in believing he was qualified to design the 11-storey concrete tower, according to investigators with the province’s professional engineering body.

Langford revoked the occupancy permit of ­Danbrook One at 2766 Claude Rd. in mid-December 2019 and urged tenants to move out after an engineering report for the municipality confirmed serious safety concerns. At the time, 86 of 90 units were rented.

An ongoing investigation by Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia has found the structural engineer on the project, Brian McClure, was not qualified to carry out structural engineering services for the building and “did not make even the minimum effort to rectify his shortcomings” before beginning work on the building.

“Failure to have proper design checks and field reviews put the public at risk and, if not reported, could have resulted in a catastrophic event,” the report says.

McClure’s experience prior to Danbrook One consisted of designing wood-frame residential buildings up to five storeys and concrete residential buildings up to two storeys. He regularly reviewed structural designs for highrise concrete buildings, but had never designed a building like Danbrook One, and “erroneously” believed his prior experience qualified him to work on the building, the report says.

The body found McClure did not meet the industry standard of between 45 to 55 field reviews, with only 17 in this case. Field reviews are those done at the building site, and at locations where building components are fabricated, it says. Danbrook One did not meet building code requirements, and the structural design includes many potential deficiencies, the report says.

No independent reviews of any part of the building’s design were done before construction of ­Danbrook One, it says.

Keep reading on TimeColinist.com


  • Chicago Build 2024 - updated - Aug 21
  • CWRE 2024
  • Premier Construction Software - Box - Sept 5
  • NIBS - Building Innovations - Digital Twins 2024
  • Canadian Concrete Expo 2025 - Box
  • TBS 2025 - Box ad
  • London Build Expo 2024 - Box
  • IAPMO R&T
  • Groundbreak 2024 - Box
  • TradesLink Box
  • Procore Box 2024
  • Metcalcon 2024
  • 2nd World Conference on Construction and Building technology
  • Buildex Alberta 2025 - Box ad
  • Keith Walking Floor - Box - Sept 2021
  • World of Asphalt 2025
  • RAIC 2025 Conference Banner
  • Dentec - Skeet Safe - Box