Tuesday, September 24, 2024
  • Dentec - Leaderboard - 2023 - Updated
  • Revizto - Leaderboard - September and October 2024
  • CWRE 2024
  • Premier Construction Software - Leaderboard New - Sept 5
  • Sage Leaderboard
  • IAPMO R&T Lab - Leaderboard
  • Keith Walking Floor - Leaderboard - Sept 2021
  • NIBS - Digital Twins 2024
  • Procore Leaderboard 2024
  • Canadian Concrete Expo 2025 - Leaderboard
July 26, 2019

Advocates slam Ontario plan to rate accessibility of buildings

As reported in The Star, a group that advocates for better accessibility standards in Ontario is voicing concerns about the province’s new assessment plan.

The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) Alliance says the plan to conduct accessibility assessments of public and private buildings will remove few barriers and is bound to be marred by conflicts of interest.

Schedule your presentation – The next-gen online marketing technology for the construction, building and design industry

In this spring’s budget, the province earmarked $1.3 million to conduct accessibility audits of some 250 public and private facilities over two years. The program will be conducted in partnership with the Rick Hansen Foundation (RHF).

In a report released this week, the AODA Alliance — a non-partisan coalition advocating for the implementation of the province’s disability accessibility laws — said the government should reconsider its decision.

AODA Alliance chair David Lepofsky said it is wrong for the government to fund a private entity like the RHF to certify its buildings.

“You can’t say, ‘Hey, you’re about to inspect my house, here’s some cash.’ You shouldn’t be allowed to do that,” said Lepofsky, a lawyer and longtime advocate for people with disabilities. “That’s a clear conflict of interest. It’s actually quite troubling.”

Using properly trained government inspectors would be a better choice, he said, as they’d be bound by the established laws of accessibility.

The alliance is also critical of the government for not consulting members of the disability community before unveiling the certification process. Lepofsky said there’s risk of leaving out people whose disabilities are not related to mobility, vision or hearing.

In a statement to the Star, Seniors and Accessibility Minister Raymond Cho said the process will be devoid of conflict of interest because those who will conduct the accessibility ratings will not be employed by the government or the RHF.

Keep reading in The Star