Canada’s Auditor General said that taxpayers are paying an extra half-billion dollars because of slow-decision-making in replacing the Champlain Bridge.
Michael Ferguson’s report also indicates that the decision to have the bridge built via a public-private partnership could cost Canadians more than if the bridge had been built outright by the federal government.
The decision to replace the Champlain Bridge is examined in the fourth report issued Tuesday by the Auditor General.
In 1999 they noted that there was a good chance that part of the bridge would fail, and five years later engineers with the Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridge Corporation determined the cost of maintaining the bridge would soon skyrocket.
However the knowledge that the Champlain was degrading quickly was not shared with Transport Canada, and so the federal government did not consider replacing the bridge until 2006-07, when the JCCBI said it would be cheaper to replace the bridge than to continue fixing it.
That prediction proved accurate.
While the annual cost of maintaining the bridge was about $10 million per year from 1999 until 2009, in subsequent years the cost jumped up to about $30 million per year, and the maintenance costs on the bridge reached $100 million in 2017.
The AG noted that it was only after five years of requests that the Harper government decided to build a new bridge. After two years of planning, the government decided to speed up the construction — at an added cost — because the old bridge was degrading so quickly.